L
T
- m
+ but they did
times of the past year I cannot but think that the presence of one of them on the Executive Council
would have detracted from the freedom and frankness
of discussion and so diminished the value of that
body's deliberations. Of course the Chinese have
something to contribute, especially to political questions, but they can always be consulted outside
the Council and their contributions seem hardly
likely to compensate for the additional strain which
the presence of their representative would impose
about non-political questions, such as the Peak, where on the Council". And what purely racial distinctions
arise? The preservation of secret and confidential
matter is another consideration which carmot be ignored.
At the moment the Governor can at least choose what
he will confide to the Chinese: appoint one to the
Executive Council and he must take the risk of
confiding everything.
It may be said that these are matters for
the Governor to consider, that he must necessarily
be the best judge, and that if he is willing to
take the risk it is not for us to stand in the way ·
There is a good deal of force in this argument but one naturally hesitates before entering into a permanent commitment and I cannot help feeling that
the Governor may have been largely influenced by the
political situation which is definitely more
promising to-day than it was a fortnight ago.
Negotiations with the Canton Government are about
to be resumed and there is reasonable ground for hope
that normal relations with Canton will shortly be
restored. In these circumstances it may well be
that the cityer desirability of creating
by tucany of los formos sut a good political effect is less strong as it is
less
very poorly in 1922 atrike.
C
Fir E. Stubbs was
ven stronger. "The eneral indifference of the community to ell matters of public lifeis
less urgent. (In this connection it may be
recently
observed that commenting on the demands of
the Canton Strike Committee for Chinese elective
representation on the Legislative Council the Governor endorsed Sir E.Stubbs' view that
"The vast majority of the Chinese teke no
interest in such matters". From this it may
+
be inferred that the pressure if any for increased representation must come from a very
lmost unbelievable." small minority.)
50384/20
There is another aspect of this
-
namely
586
proposal which merits consideration
the possibility that any such concession in Hongkong will be followed by an agitation
for a similar concession in the Straits
Settlements. And the case in the Straits
Settlements might even be stronger owing to the
greater distance from China and to the fact that
there now existe a class of Chinese who have
been Straits-born for generations and who se
loyalty to the Colony is indisputable. An
argument on which we might rely for differentiation
between Straits Settlements and Hongkong is that
in Hongkong there is no Municipality i.e. that
the Legislative and Executive Councils fulfil
also the functions of a municipal body, and
that the Chinese have therefore an additional
claim to representation. But I doubt if this
would be convincing.
In any case I do not think that
it would be advisable to assent to this proposal
without first warning Sir L. Guillemard, and obtaining further information from Sir C.Clementi, and I. Bubmit the attached drafts for consideration. I
i
would not say anything to Foreign Office at
this
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.